It's hard for me to talk about the change in my program of study. I don't know what this topic specifically refers to, but I will write about the academic mesh.
As I mentioned in previous posts, I started studying anthropology in 2018. That same year the new curriculum of the career was implemented.
The first two years of the course belong to the "basic cycle". There are branches of social anthropology, physical anthropology and archaeology. The basic cycle is where the most changes were made with the new program. because the anthropology department included some new subjects (so say the older students).
The mention of social anthropology, which is the mention that I study at present, did not have much modification. The courses remain almost the same. Varied around methodology, theory, application, ethnologies, etc.
The workshops are new courses that were incorporated in all the years of the new academic program. The workshops are courses with more practical work (which is combined with theory). That's the idea, although it's been difficult this year because of the pandemic and the virtual classrooms.
Personally, I think it is still necessary to have more practical activities in the future. They are more entertaining and effective.
However, I really like the career I am studying, and all the courses I have. Especially now that I'm at the mention of social anthropology. I must admit that the courses of archaeology and physical anthropology, I never liked.
I think things can always be improved, and the academic program of anthropology is not an exception.
I think things can always be improved, and the academic program of anthropology is not an exception. I think changes can always be made. And the opinion of professors and students is important for those changes to be positive.

